OK, gang, you’re probably wondering what’s with the posts in this blog of some of my thirty+ year old poetry, some of which reads like an existential epitaph.
Well, here’s the deal. If you’re curious, read on. It won’t take long…
After I was honorably discharged from the US Coast Guard Search and Rescue teams in 1973, I had developed a line of thought predicated on at least two premises.
First, this was a time when the Viet Nam war was still raging, and most every newscast was brimming with morbidity. Back then, the media delighted in reporting body counts on both sides of the line, for example – daily.
Having been drafted into the Army, I knew I had thirty days to enlist in another branch of service, so I enlisted in the USCG. As a result, over the ensuing four years, I was directly involved in saving over thirty souls.
Second, during that same time, however, I also witnessed not-infrequent failure. I took this very personally. I lamented my own inability to save every life threatened by the sea. As a result, my own mortality punched me squarely in the face. I also developed a chronic intolerance for failure of any sort.
Handling human corpses wasn’t a daily occurrence, but unhappily occurred often enough to instill in me a sense of horrible wonder. To this day, many of these tragic memories are still emblazoned in my mind, and my dreams, with vividly bizarre details, untoward events usually fueled by utter human stupidity, culminating in entirely avoidable tragedies in almost all cases.
Infant corpses were the worst.
Once I lapsed back into being a civilian again, and a few years on a Liberal Arts campus, I often waxed philosophical in those days. In retrospect, these epitomes of largely existential babble were more therapeutical for me than truly philosophical, nonetheless amusing to me now.
And as we all know, writing of the fabric of the human condition can’t be just about happiness and feeling good. There is an inevitable duality in our condition – good, bad, happy, sad, love, hate, epochal, trivial… One side cannot exist without the other. One cannot truly be appreciated without carnal knowledge of both slices of life, in my humble opinion, a truism shared by philosophers and prophets throughout the ages.
As we all have experienced, the fabric of all life events obviously influences our thoughts, hopes and dreams, our aspirations, our outlook, our writing. And our photography.
As I re-read some of the quasi-poetry I wrote back then, I was enchanted by how differently I feel now, but feel compelled to share a few of those decades-old perspectives. Some of the interest for me is the robust range of the human condition–even my own–perhaps especially my own. Certainly not to be ignored.
I still love the bizarre constructs of poets like ee cummings. Not sure why. Unconventional, to be sure. Celebrates different. Probably the bleeding heart liberal facade that I sometimes paint for the amusement of others.
I hope that helps put these old mental meanderings into some sort of context for you. Not sure why I felt compelled to explain all of this, but there you have it. Maybe I still need a therapeutic pen in my mortal hand. Maybe that’s what writing is entirely about?
Then:
Now:
Gene


